WAR 47774 — LR vs RACCOON RUMPUS
FOUGHT 22 Aug 15:00 – 23 Aug 22:42 UTC
DURATION 31.7H
RESULT LOSS — 7,162 vs 14,526
PULLED 25 Aug 2026 15:19 UTC
REVISED 25 Aug 2026 — RESPECT LEDGER ADDED
SOURCE TORN API v2
War roster
58
who were in LR when it started
Landed a hit
32
32 of 58 — 55%
Contributed something
43
hits or assists — of 58
Contributed nothing
14
still on the roster today
Defends held
4.5%
91 held / 1,944 lost
Left since
5
incl. the #4 and #6 scorers
Read the method before you read the names.
War hits and respect come straight from Torn’s own
rankedwarreport — those numbers are exact and I validated every one of
the 58 against each member’s rankedwarhits counter. 58 of 58 matched.
Everything else — assists, wins, losses, defends, xanax, hours played — is a delta between
two personalstats day-boundary records, 22 Aug 00:00 → 24 Aug 00:00 TCT.
That window is 48h wide and the war only occupied 31.7h of it, so those columns carry roughly
nine hours of pre-war and one hour of post-war activity. Directionally correct, not surgical.
Where I could not measure something, I have said so rather than estimated it.
List 1 — Contributed Nothing
Still on the roster today. Zero war hits and zero assists. Fourteen names — but they split into two very different conversations.
Do not read these fourteen as one group. Seven of them barely opened the
game. The other seven were online, awake, and throwing punches — just never at Raccoon Rumpus.
The first group is an absence problem. The second is a compliance problem, and it is the worse of the two.
1A — Ghosts · 7 members
No war hits, no assists, and not a single attack of any kind in the whole 48-hour window.
| Member | Lvl | Played | War hits | Assists | Any attacks | Defends lost | Xanax | Position |
|---|
| ivan_naviski | 18 | 0.1h | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 0 | Fire Brand · 28d |
| Jiggy1 | 38 | 0.2h | 0 | 0 | 0 | 48 | 0 | Fire Brand · 25d |
| dowz | 15 | 0.3h | 0 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 0 | Spark · 15d |
| fmlgrommel | 16 | 1.1h | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 2 | Spark · 15d |
| ColonelAnarchy | 53 | 1.3h | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 1 | Warrior of the Flame · 327d |
| Jifd_blr | 15 | 1.6h | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 0 | Spark · 27d |
| jmkees1 | 22 | 2.2h | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 1 | Warrior of the Flame · 92d |
ivan_naviski, Jiggy1 and dowz logged
6, 12 and 18 minutes respectively across two days. They were not there. Note also that
Jiggy1 and dowz still shipped 48 and 41 defends lost — Raccoon farmed them while they slept.
ColonelAnarchy is the outlier worth a personal word rather than a boot: 327 days in the faction,
level 53, and 78 minutes of play across the entire war.
1B — Present, But Not For The War · 7 members
Zero war hits, zero assists — and a stack of attacks aimed somewhere else entirely.
MonarchZ is the headline. Seventy attacks won, four xanax burned,
almost six hours logged — and not one of those hits went into the war. That is not a member
who was absent. That is a member who saw the war and went farming instead.
BoogieABK is the softer case: thirteen attacks, but 44 defends lost, level 12 — more likely
couldn’t find a target they could beat than wouldn’t try.
Do Not Kick These — 0 Hits, Real Contribution
A naive “zero war hits” list eats all ten of these. They assisted. Assists are war contribution.
Ownage- is the single hardest-trying member in this faction and they
finish the war with a zero next to their name. Thirty-six assists — more than anyone else in LR,
including oraN. Three attacks won against thirteen lost, four xanax, five hours. They threw themselves at
targets they had no business attacking, lost almost every one, and kept feeding the people who could
finish them. If any name on this page deserves coaching instead of a boot, it is that one.
List 2 — Bled Hard, Still Turned Up
Members who put in real effort and paid for it. Loss rate is their own failed attacks as a share of
everything they threw. Defends lost is how many times Raccoon put them down. Ranked by combined bleed.
The three to build first.
Beastmode217 — level 19, 15.5 hours played, 14 war hits, 19 assists, and a 34% loss rate
with 45 defends lost. Nobody in the bottom half of the roster worked harder or got hurt more. Give them a
target list and they will use it.
HoneyKitty — 41 war hits at level 35 is genuinely good; 77 defends lost is the second-worst on
the roster. They were picking real fights and had no cover afterwards. That is a hospital-timing and
chain-window problem, not a stat problem.
Rorschach1200 — 14.1 hours, 17 war hits, 13 assists, zero xanax. Grinding the whole war
on natural energy. Hand this one xanax and watch what happens.
Two more worth a word.
Cpat logged 14.8 hours, 13 assists and 76 defends lost — and finished with two war hits.
Sixty-five of their sixty-seven wins landed outside the war. They were working — on the wrong thing.
Jonayonthespot took 78 defends lost, the worst on the roster, and still returned 66 war hits and
837 respect from level 48. They were Raccoon’s designated target and they out-traded them anyway.
What The Defence Numbers Actually Say
LR lost 1,944 defends and held 91. A 4.5% hold rate.
Raccoon Rumpus were not out-hitting LR by a little — 1,610 attacks to 817, 14,526 score to 7,162 —
they were walking through the roster essentially unopposed on defence. Before anyone gets kicked for
“not participating,” it is worth saying plainly: for most of the sub-level-20 half of this
faction, there were no winnable targets. The 1B list is the group that had no such excuse.
One clean exception: oraN finished 134 war hits and 884 respect — and was never once
attacked. Zero defends won, zero lost. Nobody on that roster would touch them.
Respect Ledger — Net Gain
Respect earned, minus respect handed to Raccoon. Requested by Mags, 25 Aug.
How this is built — and what it is not.
Respect earned is exact, off the war report. Respect fed is modelled, not measured.
Torn does not publish who took respect off whom, and the per-hit feed that would show it needs a
faction-API key LR has not yet donated. So I have taken Raccoon’s actual final score of
14,526 and distributed it across LR’s 1,944 lost defends in proportion to
(defender level + 1) / 4 — the level term in Torn’s own respect formula.
The column sums to Raccoon’s real score exactly, and the Net column sums to the real war
margin of −7,364. Individual rows are estimates with a known bias: the formula also
scales with Fair Fight, so members who are weak for their level bleed less than shown, and
members who are strong for their level bleed more. Treat the ordering as sound and any single
row as ±20%.
Faction net respect
−7,364
7,162 earned / 14,526 fed
List 1 net
−1,992
14 members, 406 defends, zero returned
All zero-hit members
−3,169
26 members — 21.8% of Raccoon’s score
Net positive
2
EvilFalcon and Charlottemia only
The direct answer to the question. The fourteen members on List 1 fed an estimated
1,992 respect into Raccoon’s score across 406 lost defends, and returned
zero. That is 13.7% of everything Raccoon scored — roughly one respect point in
seven, donated by people who never swung back. Widen it to everyone who landed no war hit at all and
it is 3,169 respect, 21.8% of the enemy total, from 26 members holding 35% of the faction’s
lost defends.
And the part that should temper the kick list. LR lost by 7,364. Delete List 1 from the war
entirely — assume they fed nothing at all — and Raccoon still finish 12,534 to 7,162.
Still a loss, by 5,372. The bleeders are real and worth fixing, but they are not why this war was lost;
they are about a seventh of it. The other six sevenths came off members who were fighting.
Read the Return column, not the Net column, before you kick anyone. Net punishes being
high-level, because high-level members are worth more respect to farm. GerardThe2nd shows
−534 and was the fourth-best scorer in the war. Jonayonthespot shows −59 off 78 lost
defends and 66 hits. Crysi comes out at −4 after taking 37 losses at level 92. None of
those are bleed — that is what a valid target looks like. Return is respect earned per respect
fed: above 0.75× you carried your own weight, under 0.25× you were a donation.
Every member of List 1 sits at 0.00×.
Sorted worst net first. oraN tops the ledger at +884 — 134 hits and never once attacked.
Already Gone
Five of the war roster have left LR in the two days since. The bleeding did not stop when the war did.
GerardThe2nd was the fourth-highest scorer in the war (70 hits, 751 respect, 15 assists) and
FlashPigeon the sixth (57 hits). Both walked. Between them that is
127 war hits and 1,187 respect gone from the next war. If the retention conversation is happening,
it should start above the kick list, not below it.
Full Roster — All 58, Plus The Two Who Joined Since
Nobody excluded. Sorted by war hits, then assists.
Method & Limits
Exact: war hits and respect, from /faction/47774/rankedwarreport. Public endpoint, both
sides, per member. Cross-checked against every member’s rankedwarhits delta — 58/58 agreed.
Windowed: assists, attacks won/lost, defends won/lost, xanax and hours played are
personalstats deltas across the 22–24 Aug day boundaries. Torn only stamps these at
midnight, so the window cannot be trimmed to the exact war and carries ~9h before and ~1h after.
Modelled, not measured: the Respect fed column in the Respect Ledger. Torn publishes no
per-victim respect figure. Raccoon’s real 14,526 is distributed across LR’s real 1,944 lost
defends by the level term of Torn’s respect formula, (level + 1) / 4. Totals are exact;
individual rows carry Fair Fight bias and should be read as ±20%.
Not measured: I cannot yet separate “attacked an enemy and lost” from “attacked
anyone and lost,” and I cannot show who hit whom. That needs the per-hit feed at
/faction/20341/attacks, which requires an API key carrying faction API-access permission.
The key currently in the vault does not have it. One key from a member with faction API access turns every
“probably” on this page into a certainty.
Not inferred: hospital and travel state during the war is not retrievable after the fact. Where a
member shows near-zero hours played, that is a measured absence, not a guess about why.